I reported to you last week that mortgage brokers were working at “a feverish pace” attempting to process Saskatoon real estate deals to get them into the queue in advance of rule changes taking effect on October 17. That work resulted in 103 firm residential deals, up from 68 the previous week to beat sales for the same period last year by two dozen units. I expect that there will be a few stragglers that will also be reported firm next week but we should begin to quickly get some understanding of how these changes will impact markets across Canada. New listings came in at 177 this week, up from 154 a week earlier to top volume for the same week last year by 27 homes. The inventory of active residential listing for sale on the MLS® slipped lower by 34 over the course of the week to close at 1869, for a year-over-year decline of 113 properties. Most of the drop was seen in the single-family homes category which sits at 1012 today, down from 1135 a year ago. Condo inventory slipped two from last week to 688, up from 672 a year ago. As you might expect, those affected most by mortgage rule changes are at the entry levels and that’s the kind of product that saw the greatest surge this week. That pushed the weekly median price and the weekly average lower to $319,900 and $339,302 respectively. Both of the longer term measures in a downward direction as well. The six-week average price slid nearly three thousand dollars from the week before to finish at $352,700 to claim an annual increase of seven thousand dollars. The four-week median price dropped four thousand dollars on the week to $335,000 for a year-over-year loss approaching 10K. While 11 sellers managed to find a buyer willing to settle a deal at full list price, just two were lucky enough to find someone who would pay more than the asking price, one by $10,100 and the other by just $100. The remaining 90 deals required some give on the seller’s side. Those transactions closed showing an average discount of $13,321.

I’m always happy to answer your Saskatoon real estate questions.  All of my contact info is here. Please feel free to call or email.

Norm Fisher Royal LePage Vidorra

Receive a weekly digest of our blog posts


Curious about home values in your area? Receive a free report that includes sale prices of recently sold homes, average days on the market and average discounts.

Post CommentComments: 0Read Full Story

Vermiculite is a mica-like mineral mined around the world and used in a variety of products including insulation. Vermiculite mined from the Libby Mine in Montana between 1920 and 1990 is known to contain asbestos, which can cause asbestosis, lung cancer and mesothelioma in people who are exposed to airborne particles.


Vermiculite was one of a number of loose fill insulation products approved for installation under the Canadian Home Insulation Program (CHIP) that provided grants to home owners who improved energy efficiency in their property between 1977 and 1984. Health Canada believes that vermiculite was installed in approximately 250,000 Canadian homes during that time. There is no information available as to where vermiculite use was most common but I can tell you that I have run across Saskatoon homes containing vermiculite insulation a number of times during my real estate career.


Health Canada’s position is this; “If vermiculite-based insulation is contained and not exposed to the home or interior environment, it poses very little risk.” Perhaps this provides some comfort to homeowners who have vermiculite insulation in their home, but in my own experience, the presence of asbestos is a growing concern for home buyers. Asbestos which is contained and undisturbed may never cause you or others in your home health problems but there is some significant likelihood that it could cause problems in completing a home sale when you’re ready to move. Some home buyers may be totally disinterested in purchasing a home that contains such a potentially toxic substance insisting that it be remediated as a condition of the sale, or they may walk away from the deal all together once they know.


It’s important to note that not all vermiculite insulation contains asbestos. If you suspect that you may have vermiculite insulation in your home you should avoid disturbing it. Contact a qualified expert for assistance in obtaining a sample for testing. In Saskatoon, Pillar to Post Home Inspections is qualified to gather samples and they can submit them to a lab on your behalf for testing. Testing costs can vary from one day to the next, but generally, a range of $150-$200 is what you should expect to pay for the service. If vermiculite is present in your home and it does not contain asbestos, a lab report will be helpful in eliminating the concern that potential buyers for your home may have when you’re ready to sell. If it does contain asbestos, you can decide to remediate now, begin saving for an eventual remediation, or you can choose to leave it and deal with it at the time of sale. Remember though, leaving it until that late stage almost certainly raises significant concerns for your prospective buyer and could derail your sale.


One should probably consider that knowing your home contains asbestos might require you to disclose its presence when you offer the home for sale. The Property Condition Disclosure Statement (PCDS), which is not mandatory for home sellers, but is commonly used in Saskatchewan, has the following question. “To the best of your knowledge does the dwelling contain asbestos or urea formaldehyde insulation?” If you know asbestos exists, you are legally required to answer this question in the affirmative, if you choose to utilize the form. Home buyers are often suspicious of sellers who refuse to complete a PCDS. Even if you choose not to use the form a buyer could argue that disclosure is required based on the potential health implications of asbestos. In any case, professional home inspections are so common that it’s doubtful that vermiculite in your home could escape scrutiny when selling.


Norm Fisher

Royal LePage Vidorra

Post CommentComments: 0Read Full Story
Google Analytics Alternative