<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saskatoon real estate week in review–October 26-30 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re bringing Saskatoon real estate to life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:41:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/#comment-3399</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5221#comment-3399</guid>
		<description>Rivera, &quot;I wonder if it’ll ever go through.&quot; I think at the very least, buyers and sellers are going to find more options available to them. And finding a good real estate agent (to buy or sell) will be more important than ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rivera, &#8220;I wonder if it’ll ever go through.&#8221; I think at the very least, buyers and sellers are going to find more options available to them. And finding a good real estate agent (to buy or sell) will be more important than ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rivera</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/#comment-3398</link>
		<dc:creator>Rivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5221#comment-3398</guid>
		<description>&quot;Competition Bureau seeks real estate shake-up
http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=2173949&quot;

Wow, that&#039;s great. I wonder if it&#039;ll ever go through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Competition Bureau seeks real estate shake-up<br />
<a href="http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=2173949" rel="nofollow">http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=2173949</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow, that&#8217;s great. I wonder if it&#8217;ll ever go through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/#comment-3397</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5221#comment-3397</guid>
		<description>Ryan, &lt;i&gt;&quot;We’ve just witnessed the worst bay street implosion since the great depression and the result was a recession no worse than what we saw in the 1980’s.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; We&#039;re still not out of it (latest GDP data), the Bank of Canada is alluding to another housing bubble, interest rates are slated to rise in the near future and another stock market correction is just around the corner. I don&#039;t think this is over by a long shot, and we could very well see another round of bank collapses, additional bailouts and a subsequent second stimulus package.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, <i>&#8220;We’ve just witnessed the worst bay street implosion since the great depression and the result was a recession no worse than what we saw in the 1980’s.&#8221;</i> We&#8217;re still not out of it (latest GDP data), the Bank of Canada is alluding to another housing bubble, interest rates are slated to rise in the near future and another stock market correction is just around the corner. I don&#8217;t think this is over by a long shot, and we could very well see another round of bank collapses, additional bailouts and a subsequent second stimulus package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/#comment-3396</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5221#comment-3396</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Competition Bureau seeks real estate shake-up&lt;/b&gt;
http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=2173949
&lt;i&gt;&quot;A landmark investigation by the federal Competition Bureau may dramatically change the way homes are bought and sold in Canada. The Canadian Real Estate Association has informed its members that a two-year inquiry by the Competition Bureau has been completed and that significant changes to their practices have been requested.&quot;

&quot;CREA is still negotiating a settlement with the Competition Bureau, but it is expected that the industry will be forced to loosen its restrictive access to the MLS system and allow discount brokers into the market. More significantly for Canadian homebuyers, they may pay less in realty commissions and fees if the Bureau gets a favourable settlement.&quot;

&quot;If CREA reverses its stance on MLS, home buyer&#039;s agent will be able to negotiate directly with the seller or the seller&#039;s lawyer if the seller chooses, and not be required to have a listing agent involved in the negotiations.&quot;

&quot;In addition, consumers could pay a fee to list their homes directly on MLS.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Competition Bureau seeks real estate shake-up</b><br />
<a href="http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=2173949" rel="nofollow">http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=2173949</a><br />
<i>&#8220;A landmark investigation by the federal Competition Bureau may dramatically change the way homes are bought and sold in Canada. The Canadian Real Estate Association has informed its members that a two-year inquiry by the Competition Bureau has been completed and that significant changes to their practices have been requested.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;CREA is still negotiating a settlement with the Competition Bureau, but it is expected that the industry will be forced to loosen its restrictive access to the MLS system and allow discount brokers into the market. More significantly for Canadian homebuyers, they may pay less in realty commissions and fees if the Bureau gets a favourable settlement.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;If CREA reverses its stance on MLS, home buyer&#8217;s agent will be able to negotiate directly with the seller or the seller&#8217;s lawyer if the seller chooses, and not be required to have a listing agent involved in the negotiations.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;In addition, consumers could pay a fee to list their homes directly on MLS.&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Fisher</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/#comment-3395</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5221#comment-3395</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jen. 

&quot;Activity and prices will improve in the second half of this year&quot;

I wonder of CMHC is aware that the year is all but over and that the housing market probably can&#039;t really &quot;improve&quot; in most parts of the country?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jen. </p>
<p>&#8220;Activity and prices will improve in the second half of this year&#8221;</p>
<p>I wonder of CMHC is aware that the year is all but over and that the housing market probably can&#8217;t really &#8220;improve&#8221; in most parts of the country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/#comment-3394</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5221#comment-3394</guid>
		<description>Just caught this- thought I&#039;d pass it along:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/housing-activity-seen-reviving/article1347949/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Housing activity seen reviving: Activity and prices will improve in the second half of this year and grow further in 2010, CMHC says&lt;/a&gt;

&quot;Among provinces, housing starts in Saskatchewan will slide to just 3,600 units this year, nearly half levels of the previous year. A strong economy and a relatively robust labour market, which will attract migrants to the province, will cause housing starts to rebound to 4,350 units next year, CMHC expects.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just caught this- thought I&#8217;d pass it along:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/housing-activity-seen-reviving/article1347949/" rel="nofollow">Housing activity seen reviving: Activity and prices will improve in the second half of this year and grow further in 2010, CMHC says</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Among provinces, housing starts in Saskatchewan will slide to just 3,600 units this year, nearly half levels of the previous year. A strong economy and a relatively robust labour market, which will attract migrants to the province, will cause housing starts to rebound to 4,350 units next year, CMHC expects.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/#comment-3393</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5221#comment-3393</guid>
		<description>These are all good points.  We also have to think about how these policy changes have interacted (longer amortizations and temporarily low interest rates) and how they might have the potential to hurt the very people they were set out to assist when interest rates start their inevitable rise. Particularly if the economy doesn’t smarten up pretty quickly, or employment or wages soften further. 

In fact, the lengthening of amortizations was an issue before the economic downturn and the subsequent historically low interest rates, via increasing demand by previously nonqualified buyers, lowering supply, and driving up prices.  If wages had also risen, this may have been sustainable; unfortunately, it just became easier to carry the debt. The two of them together (long amorts plus very low borrowing costs) have created a scenario in which the pendulum of affordability has perhaps swung too far, given the precariousness of the economic recovery and the future direction of interest rates. People on the edge of affording the monthly payments at these rates and amortization schedules may not be able to carry the debt when things change. Amortization length is still up in the air, but interest rates are certainly not going down from here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are all good points.  We also have to think about how these policy changes have interacted (longer amortizations and temporarily low interest rates) and how they might have the potential to hurt the very people they were set out to assist when interest rates start their inevitable rise. Particularly if the economy doesn’t smarten up pretty quickly, or employment or wages soften further. </p>
<p>In fact, the lengthening of amortizations was an issue before the economic downturn and the subsequent historically low interest rates, via increasing demand by previously nonqualified buyers, lowering supply, and driving up prices.  If wages had also risen, this may have been sustainable; unfortunately, it just became easier to carry the debt. The two of them together (long amorts plus very low borrowing costs) have created a scenario in which the pendulum of affordability has perhaps swung too far, given the precariousness of the economic recovery and the future direction of interest rates. People on the edge of affording the monthly payments at these rates and amortization schedules may not be able to carry the debt when things change. Amortization length is still up in the air, but interest rates are certainly not going down from here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/#comment-3392</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5221#comment-3392</guid>
		<description>CMHC is an insurance scheme that generates a ton of money for the government. It protects capitalistic organizations, ie banks. It is also possible to get similar insurance from completely private sector insurance companies. There are a lot of things about it that I find frustrating, but to suggest that it is tantamount to communism is truly bizarre. 

Almost as bizarre as suggesting we haven&#039;t learned anything since the great depression. We’ve just witnessed the worst bay street implosion since the great depression and the result was a recession no worse than what we saw in the 1980’s. Heck, outside the automoble industry where they&#039;ve caused their own pain things are that bad. Life for the average consumer is actually MUCH better then almost any recession in history. Things aren’t fantastic, by the hyperbole by some here borders on things I can’t say due to blog rules!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CMHC is an insurance scheme that generates a ton of money for the government. It protects capitalistic organizations, ie banks. It is also possible to get similar insurance from completely private sector insurance companies. There are a lot of things about it that I find frustrating, but to suggest that it is tantamount to communism is truly bizarre. </p>
<p>Almost as bizarre as suggesting we haven&#8217;t learned anything since the great depression. We’ve just witnessed the worst bay street implosion since the great depression and the result was a recession no worse than what we saw in the 1980’s. Heck, outside the automoble industry where they&#8217;ve caused their own pain things are that bad. Life for the average consumer is actually MUCH better then almost any recession in history. Things aren’t fantastic, by the hyperbole by some here borders on things I can’t say due to blog rules!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Fisher</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/#comment-3391</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5221#comment-3391</guid>
		<description>Jason,

&quot;Anything you adjust (amortization, financial requirements or interest rates) has the potential to crash the market in a few years time when everything resets.&quot;

That&#039;s my point. I&#039;m just saying that the powers that be a very aware of how quickly things would go from bad to worse if they move too much too quickly.

Steven,

I suppose it&#039;s safe to say that you have ever used CMHC to buy property then?

I&#039;m not suggesting for a moment that standards have not become too lax. I am suggesting that over time, CMHC has done much good in terms of opening up how ownership opportunities for Canadians, and I suspect that we have all be enriched through those opened doors. There&#039;s a a fair bit going on between capitalism and communism, and while we have definitely moved further to the left, suggesting that we are in danger of becoming a communist nation is a bit over the top.

Oh, by the way, is CMHC losing money or are you forecasting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,</p>
<p>&#8220;Anything you adjust (amortization, financial requirements or interest rates) has the potential to crash the market in a few years time when everything resets.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my point. I&#8217;m just saying that the powers that be a very aware of how quickly things would go from bad to worse if they move too much too quickly.</p>
<p>Steven,</p>
<p>I suppose it&#8217;s safe to say that you have ever used CMHC to buy property then?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not suggesting for a moment that standards have not become too lax. I am suggesting that over time, CMHC has done much good in terms of opening up how ownership opportunities for Canadians, and I suspect that we have all be enriched through those opened doors. There&#8217;s a a fair bit going on between capitalism and communism, and while we have definitely moved further to the left, suggesting that we are in danger of becoming a communist nation is a bit over the top.</p>
<p>Oh, by the way, is CMHC losing money or are you forecasting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/#comment-3390</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5221#comment-3390</guid>
		<description>Communism is defined as &quot;actual ownership being attributed to the community as a whole or to the state&quot;. CMHC is communism, or a socialist policy. I ask you how is it capitialistic? Is it mainly funded by private investors? - No! If I end up paying greater taxes because I am part of the community that funds the feds for underwriting my fellow neighbours house, that is communism to me.  However; if CMHC raises the mortgage insurance fee to cover its losses, I would consider that to be more like capitialism.

Carney&#039;s mandate is to control inflation. He has no powers over the banking act that controls amortization and downpayments.  And who changes acts in this country - politicians. He can only suggest and influence the policy making of Flarety and the CMHC. Norm, do you think politicians know what the &quot;key&quot; is. I am sceptical that policy makers have the guts to make hard decisions and tell Canadians what is really good for them.

Society has learned very little from the Great Depression. The thinking behind current stimulus was that during the Great Depression governments were slow to react. I feel society will learn from current economic conditions that stimulus/relief acts against the longer-term interests, and undermines the independence and resilience of economy regardless of how fast money is injected. 

The economy is a force that society can only debate over until a resolution is achieved. Just imagine we are on a flight in a airplane called &quot;the economy&quot;. If it&#039;s gonna crash, there really is nothing that can be done other than to take preventive measure to have a safe landing. So far some measures have been taken to prepare for the landing, but &quot;may I have your attention please&quot; there is still fuel in its wings. Any proposals on what to do with the explosive material? I know fuel is expensive, but I don&#039;t want to be burned because someone else sees value in keeping the fuel. I suggest dumping the 35 year amortization and low qualification to buy a house combustible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Communism is defined as &#8220;actual ownership being attributed to the community as a whole or to the state&#8221;. CMHC is communism, or a socialist policy. I ask you how is it capitialistic? Is it mainly funded by private investors? &#8211; No! If I end up paying greater taxes because I am part of the community that funds the feds for underwriting my fellow neighbours house, that is communism to me.  However; if CMHC raises the mortgage insurance fee to cover its losses, I would consider that to be more like capitialism.</p>
<p>Carney&#8217;s mandate is to control inflation. He has no powers over the banking act that controls amortization and downpayments.  And who changes acts in this country &#8211; politicians. He can only suggest and influence the policy making of Flarety and the CMHC. Norm, do you think politicians know what the &#8220;key&#8221; is. I am sceptical that policy makers have the guts to make hard decisions and tell Canadians what is really good for them.</p>
<p>Society has learned very little from the Great Depression. The thinking behind current stimulus was that during the Great Depression governments were slow to react. I feel society will learn from current economic conditions that stimulus/relief acts against the longer-term interests, and undermines the independence and resilience of economy regardless of how fast money is injected. </p>
<p>The economy is a force that society can only debate over until a resolution is achieved. Just imagine we are on a flight in a airplane called &#8220;the economy&#8221;. If it&#8217;s gonna crash, there really is nothing that can be done other than to take preventive measure to have a safe landing. So far some measures have been taken to prepare for the landing, but &#8220;may I have your attention please&#8221; there is still fuel in its wings. Any proposals on what to do with the explosive material? I know fuel is expensive, but I don&#8217;t want to be burned because someone else sees value in keeping the fuel. I suggest dumping the 35 year amortization and low qualification to buy a house combustible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/#comment-3389</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5221#comment-3389</guid>
		<description>Norm, &lt;i&gt;&quot;The key will be to bring just enough pressure to “cool” the market, not to crash it.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; Anything you adjust (amortization, financial requirements or interest rates) has the potential to crash the market in a few years time when everything resets.

Rick, &lt;i&gt;&quot;Of course the question now is what is he waiting for.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; I would say the aforementioned economic recovery, wouldn&#039;t you?

&lt;i&gt;&quot;CMHC has grown to a uncomfortably socialistic point that Canada is pushing communism.&lt;/i&gt; Steven, you bring up an interesting point. At one point in time there was a tradeoff in terms of lifestyle, spending habits and discipline to become a homeowner. CHMC has removed this requirement and diligence by rewarding and incentivizing bad behaviour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norm, <i>&#8220;The key will be to bring just enough pressure to “cool” the market, not to crash it.&#8221;</i> Anything you adjust (amortization, financial requirements or interest rates) has the potential to crash the market in a few years time when everything resets.</p>
<p>Rick, <i>&#8220;Of course the question now is what is he waiting for.&#8221;</i> I would say the aforementioned economic recovery, wouldn&#8217;t you?</p>
<p><i>&#8220;CMHC has grown to a uncomfortably socialistic point that Canada is pushing communism.</i> Steven, you bring up an interesting point. At one point in time there was a tradeoff in terms of lifestyle, spending habits and discipline to become a homeowner. CHMC has removed this requirement and diligence by rewarding and incentivizing bad behaviour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Fisher</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/#comment-3388</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5221#comment-3388</guid>
		<description>Rick,

The key will be to bring just enough pressure to &quot;cool&quot; the market, not to crash it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>The key will be to bring just enough pressure to &#8220;cool&#8221; the market, not to crash it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/#comment-3387</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5221#comment-3387</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right I don&#039;t think Carney mentioned anything other then options. Now we all know hindsight is 20/20 but after the huge bubble in America and our own inflationary pressures in housing, you would think that the government could have raised qualifications for home purchasers while lowering interest rates to stimulate the broader economy. Now Carney may have some success talking down the irrational exuberance if he directs it to the lending institutions, but the borrowing public will just continue to borrow as much as the banks are willing to lend. If he mandates that the lenders share in some of the default risk and borrows have to put up more money over shorter ammortization periods as well as reduce the amount of RRSP withdrawls, that would likely cool things down a bit. Of course the question now is what is he waiting for. An further, with all this tightening and loosening and suggested rule changes, it really makes you wonder who wins and who loses out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right I don&#8217;t think Carney mentioned anything other then options. Now we all know hindsight is 20/20 but after the huge bubble in America and our own inflationary pressures in housing, you would think that the government could have raised qualifications for home purchasers while lowering interest rates to stimulate the broader economy. Now Carney may have some success talking down the irrational exuberance if he directs it to the lending institutions, but the borrowing public will just continue to borrow as much as the banks are willing to lend. If he mandates that the lenders share in some of the default risk and borrows have to put up more money over shorter ammortization periods as well as reduce the amount of RRSP withdrawls, that would likely cool things down a bit. Of course the question now is what is he waiting for. An further, with all this tightening and loosening and suggested rule changes, it really makes you wonder who wins and who loses out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Fisher</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/#comment-3386</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5221#comment-3386</guid>
		<description>&quot;Carney is pursuing other measures to cool houses other than raising interest rates. He hasn’t said it yet, but I think he’s going for shorter amortization and higher down payments on houses.&quot;

He hasn&#039;t said he&#039;s going to do anything yet, has he? I think he said that he has options to cool the housing market besides raising rates if he deems it necessary.

&quot;...that Canada is pushing communism.&quot;

Communism Steven? Because of CMHC? How is CMHC pushing our country towards communism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Carney is pursuing other measures to cool houses other than raising interest rates. He hasn’t said it yet, but I think he’s going for shorter amortization and higher down payments on houses.&#8221;</p>
<p>He hasn&#8217;t said he&#8217;s going to do anything yet, has he? I think he said that he has options to cool the housing market besides raising rates if he deems it necessary.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;that Canada is pushing communism.&#8221;</p>
<p>Communism Steven? Because of CMHC? How is CMHC pushing our country towards communism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/#comment-3385</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5221#comment-3385</guid>
		<description>Rick,

I think the boondogle is Harper&#039;s, and Flarety&#039;s. Carney stepped into David Dodges
shoes after the boondogle got started. Carney is pursuing other measures to cool houses other than raising interest rates. He hasn&#039;t said it yet, but I think he&#039;s going for shorter amortization and higher down payments on houses. I&#039;m all for it! I disagree with CMHC and have never bought a house with them underwriting it. CMHC has grown to a uncomfortably socialistic point that Canada is pushing communism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>I think the boondogle is Harper&#8217;s, and Flarety&#8217;s. Carney stepped into David Dodges<br />
shoes after the boondogle got started. Carney is pursuing other measures to cool houses other than raising interest rates. He hasn&#8217;t said it yet, but I think he&#8217;s going for shorter amortization and higher down payments on houses. I&#8217;m all for it! I disagree with CMHC and have never bought a house with them underwriting it. CMHC has grown to a uncomfortably socialistic point that Canada is pushing communism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Fisher</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/#comment-3384</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 03:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5221#comment-3384</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ten condos between the price of $75 and 100k, that does sound interesting and somewhat strange?&quot;

I believe &lt;a href=&quot;http://listings.myrealpage.com/wps/recip/11901/ListingDetails.form?listingId=9446172&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this building &lt;/a&gt;was converted to condos and the units are being sold off as is, so they&#039;re a bit dated and need some work. Nine of the ten sales were made by the same agent, perhaps to the same buyer who picked them up for revenue or resale. Guessing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ten condos between the price of $75 and 100k, that does sound interesting and somewhat strange?&#8221;</p>
<p>I believe <a href="http://listings.myrealpage.com/wps/recip/11901/ListingDetails.form?listingId=9446172" rel="nofollow">this building </a>was converted to condos and the units are being sold off as is, so they&#8217;re a bit dated and need some work. Nine of the ten sales were made by the same agent, perhaps to the same buyer who picked them up for revenue or resale. Guessing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review%e2%80%93october-26-30-2009/#comment-3383</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 02:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5221#comment-3383</guid>
		<description>Hey Norm,

Ten condos between the price of $75 and 100k, that does sound interesting and somewhat strange? And sales, amazing what low interest rates and lenders who make all the profits and share in none of the risk can do for the housing market. But the government claims to have many more arrows in their quivers, you know 10% down and 25yr ammortizations. Of course now our economy has reached total goverenment control, intervention and manipulation. The economy can&#039;t correct, the government won&#039;t let it. We are no longer in a market economy, this approach did&#039;nt work well for the Soviet Union, and of course it&#039;s just a matter of time before the government gets a big slap which they don&#039;t see whilst they are  so busy with their fancy financial foot work. The tax payers will pay more tax then they should have which doesn&#039;t help GDP much, to pay for  Harper, Flarety, and Carney&#039;s boondogle economic approach. The three &amp;*^$%&#039;s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Norm,</p>
<p>Ten condos between the price of $75 and 100k, that does sound interesting and somewhat strange? And sales, amazing what low interest rates and lenders who make all the profits and share in none of the risk can do for the housing market. But the government claims to have many more arrows in their quivers, you know 10% down and 25yr ammortizations. Of course now our economy has reached total goverenment control, intervention and manipulation. The economy can&#8217;t correct, the government won&#8217;t let it. We are no longer in a market economy, this approach did&#8217;nt work well for the Soviet Union, and of course it&#8217;s just a matter of time before the government gets a big slap which they don&#8217;t see whilst they are  so busy with their fancy financial foot work. The tax payers will pay more tax then they should have which doesn&#8217;t help GDP much, to pay for  Harper, Flarety, and Carney&#8217;s boondogle economic approach. The three &amp;*^$%&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

