Follow On Twitter Fan TeamFisher On Facebook TeamFisher On YouTube
View Featured Properties

7

Saskatoon real estate week in review-December 14-18 2009

It was a surprisingly strong week for Saskatoon real estate sales given how close we are to Christmas. The phone rang a lot while offers and counter offers made their way back and forth, and by the close of the week a total of fifty-five Saskatoon homes were reported sold to the MLS system including thirty-four houses and twenty-one condominiums. That’s a decline of just three units compared to last week, and an increase of nine properties compared to the same week last year.

New listings slowed substantially, which seems reasonable given the season. Just thirty-three houses and condominiums came on the market, a drop of more than fifty percent compared to last week and well off of the sixty homes listed during the same week in 2008.

Saskatoon MLS listings (all residential) fell rather hard once again losing nearly five percent of total volume and slipping from 802 to 765 by the weekend including 437 single-family detached homes and 280 condominiums. At the present time, listings for 143 Saskatoon homes are scheduled to expire by the end of December, so I expect that we’ll see a fairly significant slide at the end of the month before listing inventory starts to grow again in anticipation of the spring market. It seems likely that our line of active listings for 2010 will come out on the left side of the graph someplace between 600 and 700. However, we only have to look back to 2008 to understand that regardless of where we start we can still peak at a pretty lofty number. I don’t get the sense that there will be an unusually large flow of listings in 2010, unless perhaps, we see a surge in prices that provides a window of opportunity for investors who bought at the peak hoping for a profit. I have no good feel for how much of that kind of inventory might exist today.

Cancelled and withdrawn listings were nearly non-existent at just eight homes, two of those quickly returning to the market bearing the “new listing” flag. Eleven sellers signed a price adjustment, though four of eleven went up in price, rather than down.

The average selling price of a Saskatoon home fell again for the second week in a row slipping less than three thousand dollars to $295,825, about five thousand dollars higher than it was last year at this time. The six-week average remained steady and very near the high for the year finishing at $287,587, a gain of over eight thousand dollars on a year-over-year basis. The four-week median price surged higher trumping last week’s number by nearly fourteen thousand dollars and reaching $280,000, a full twenty-five thousand dollars higher than it was for the same week in 2008. If it’s not already clear, I think it’s important to note that the year-over-year gains we’re seeing now result more from last December’s very tough conditions than they do from this year’s performance. Prices were essentially bottoming out at this time last year after several consecutive months of losses. This year, they’ve pretty much remained stable. The average price has come in between $280,000 and $290,000 more than fifty percent of the time this year. Prices are up year-over-year but they don’t seem to be increasing much more recently. I would say that there is some upward pressure under the $300,000 mark, and condos have inched up some, but the increases are very marginal.

Home buyers must have been in a giving mood this week as the average underbid on Saskatoon homes that sold for less than the asking price fell from $11,371 to just $9,924. That represents an average discount of approximately 3.2% of the asking price, down from 3.6% last week. Five home sales were reported as having traded above the asking price by an average of $750.

The bubble talk that began in October has continued to be a popular story for the national media. Gregory Klump, chief economist for the Canadian Real Estate Association insisted that Canadian real estate markets are balancing with increased listing activity. Meanwhile, Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty issued a warning that the feds are prepared to act “if” a housing bubble occurs. Stuck between a bit of a rock and a hard spot on interest rates, Flaherty suggested that the preferred method of dealing with such a bubble would be by shortening amortization periods and raising minimum down payment requirements. Of course, I have no way of knowing for sure, but when the Bank of Canada is issuing repeated debt warnings, and the Federal Finance Minister starts asking people to cool their jets there may be reason to feel concerned. Aren’t these the people whom we expect to feed us the “all is well” side of the argument?

Again, the fact that we’ve seen very little price movement even though demand has been exceptionally strong and inventory has been falling like a rock may be a sign that people are paying about as much as they can afford. Higher down payments and shorter amortization periods will erode affordability further. If there’s no more free income to absorb those increases, prices have got to come down.

Will this overheated Canadian real estate market sort itself out before spring? Are exceptionally strong unit sale numbers the result of pent-up demand from last year’s downturn, and if so, will that pent-up demand be exhausted soon? Will the government intervene and take steps to cool the housing market? There are some tough calls to be made for anyone speculating this year.

A map displaying the boundaries of Saskatoon real estate areas is here.
An overview of data collection and calculation practices for our statistical reports is here.

I’m always happy to answer your Saskatoon real estate questions.  All of my contact info is here. Please feel free to call or email.

Real estate geeks can follow our daily updates on Twitter @norm_fisher.

Our Saskatoon home search tool offers MLS listings represented by all real estate brands, presented with more detail than you’ll find anywhere else. Check it out here.

Norm Fisher
Royal LePage Saskatoon Real Estate

7 comments so far. We'd love to hear your thoughts.

  • guy_in_regina
    December 19th, 2009 at 8:08 PM

    Great post loaded with info, as usual, Norm.

    “Aren’t these the people whom we expect to feed us the “all is well” side of the argument?”

    Yeah. It’s kinda like Ronald McDonald telling you to watch your cholesterol!

    If he’s concerned…..

  • Norm Fisher
    December 20th, 2009 at 9:37 AM

    Lol. Good one.

    I expect we will probably see some action taken. Not sure how I feel about higher minimum down payments but I could see a move back in the direction of 25-year amortizations.

  • Jen
    December 20th, 2009 at 4:24 PM

    I think we’ll see some movement in the direction of shorter amortizations before we’ll see any movement toward higher down-payments. I don’t see both happening together, particularly since interest rates have nowhere to go but up (or perhaps sideways for a bit).

    Anyway, Norm, thanks again for continuing to address these issues- much prior to the mainstream media’s coverage of them.

    All the best to everyone over the holiday season! Stay safe and enjoy your loved ones. :)

  • Jen
    December 21st, 2009 at 10:54 AM

    Ahhh, Jim’s moving forward from bare acknowledgement to slightly less vague considerations. ‘Bout time, Jim- let’s see some action, man.

    http://bit.ly/63nP1u

    “CTV says Ottawa is considering raising the minimum down payment for home buyers as well as reducing the amortization period in order to stop some consumers from taking on too much debt.

    In an interview with CTV Question Period, to be aired next week, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says the measures will be taken if there’s evidence of excessive demand in the housing market.

    Flaherty says the new measures would target consumers “who are taking on obligations that they will not be able to handle in the future when the interest rates do rise.”

    He says the likely measures the government will take is to increase the size of the down payment from 5 per cent “to a higher figure” and to reduce the amortization period “from a maximum of 35 years to something less.”

  • Norm Fisher
    December 21st, 2009 at 12:01 PM

    “as well as” Sounds like both options are in play.

    Still qualified with an “if.”

    Hmmm. This should be interesting.

    In the recently released TD Housing Outlook, the writer suggested that “pent-up” demand resulting from last year’s slow down should be satisfied by the end on November, or the end of December at the latest.

    I read this morning on Larry’s blog that the market appears to be cooling some in North Vancouver with a “wave of reductions.”

    Here is CTV’s report including some video of Flaherty.

    In Saskatoon, we’re sitting at 152 unit sales for December, 2009. Compare that to 162 units for the entire month of December in 2008, and 161 units as the five-year average for the month of December. I’m guessing we’ll see thirty more sales this week, and possibly as many as 3o next week.

  • BAHTAWAR
    December 21st, 2009 at 9:23 PM

    Hi Norm, what u think about the stonebrige market, if we compare it with willowgrove and rosewood. is good time to sell it.
    thx

  • Norm Fisher
    December 21st, 2009 at 10:16 PM

    Bahtawar,

    There really isn’t a resale market in Rosewood yet. To date, no recorded sales on the MLS system.

    Inventory levels in Stonebridge are reasonable given the higher price point which can be a bit more challenging today. There are just 26 single-family homes for sale with sales of 14 units over the past sixty days. That means there is currently about a 3.7 month supply of homes. Not an easy market for a seller, but far better than it would have been a year ago. In Willowgrove, we have 71 single-family homes for sale, and 30 sales over the past sixty days, meaning there is a 4.8 month supply of homes available.

    Is it a good time to sell? It’s all speculation but I’m starting to get the impression that we are going to see some changes to the lending rules. If you believe that to be the case, then now might be the best time to sell for some time to come. Higher down payments will seriously limit the number of buyers who can buy a home. Shorter amortization periods would force payments higher meaning that all buyers would be have to buy less house to qualify.

    Conversely, if these changes don’t happen we could see a very active market as long as rates remain low.

    Tough call.