<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saskatoon real estate week in review-December 21-25 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-december-21-25-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-december-21-25-2009/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re bringing Saskatoon real estate to life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:41:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-december-21-25-2009/#comment-3688</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 18:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5622#comment-3688</guid>
		<description>400-600 homes is also Saskatoon&#039;s normal market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>400-600 homes is also Saskatoon&#8217;s normal market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-december-21-25-2009/#comment-3687</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 17:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5622#comment-3687</guid>
		<description>Jeremy, I expect interest rates to rise shortly after June. Probably near 2 full points by year end. With housing prices already high it&#039;ll put a damper on upward pressure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy, I expect interest rates to rise shortly after June. Probably near 2 full points by year end. With housing prices already high it&#8217;ll put a damper on upward pressure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Fisher</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-december-21-25-2009/#comment-3686</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5622#comment-3686</guid>
		<description>The month of December closed with 211 residential sales, up from 161 last December. The average sale price came in at $291,554, up from $266,411 for December of 2008. The median sale price of a residential property in Saskatoon increased by roughly the same percentage climbing from 249,000 last December to $277,000 this December.

The 3-month average selling price for 2009 is $280,739, up just slightly from $277,895 a year ago.

As of this morning, and following the expiration of 101 MLS listings since December 25, active residential listings are at 619 units, their lowest level since March of 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The month of December closed with 211 residential sales, up from 161 last December. The average sale price came in at $291,554, up from $266,411 for December of 2008. The median sale price of a residential property in Saskatoon increased by roughly the same percentage climbing from 249,000 last December to $277,000 this December.</p>
<p>The 3-month average selling price for 2009 is $280,739, up just slightly from $277,895 a year ago.</p>
<p>As of this morning, and following the expiration of 101 MLS listings since December 25, active residential listings are at 619 units, their lowest level since March of 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-december-21-25-2009/#comment-3685</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5622#comment-3685</guid>
		<description>Ryan, if inventory went down to 500 next summer, 1/3 of &#039;09 inventory and an even smaller fraction of the &#039;08 numbers, how do you conclude there will be only 1-3% upward price pressure? Are you assuming downpayment/amortization changes? It seems most are predicting upward pressure this spring/summer up to 10%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, if inventory went down to 500 next summer, 1/3 of &#8217;09 inventory and an even smaller fraction of the &#8217;08 numbers, how do you conclude there will be only 1-3% upward price pressure? Are you assuming downpayment/amortization changes? It seems most are predicting upward pressure this spring/summer up to 10%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve R</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-december-21-25-2009/#comment-3684</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5622#comment-3684</guid>
		<description>So what happens, if all the expiring listings decide to wait six months or a year before trying again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what happens, if all the expiring listings decide to wait six months or a year before trying again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-december-21-25-2009/#comment-3683</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5622#comment-3683</guid>
		<description>There is no harm or loss in making your points clear.  I find brevity to be a gateway to endless misunderstandings, you don&#039;t set rules on communication.  That&#039;s just asinine.

As you have discovered, I also observe moments to keep it simple.

But now you see, I&#039;ve proven that it isn&#039;t how much I said, as much as it is what I said that got you to mention it in the first place.  Yet even though you disagreed, you chose to pick that of all things.

Strange isn&#039;t it?  That embodies of some of the flawed reasoning people use nowadays.  The connection is that where I come from and who I speak with, going into detail isn&#039;t a technical foul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no harm or loss in making your points clear.  I find brevity to be a gateway to endless misunderstandings, you don&#8217;t set rules on communication.  That&#8217;s just asinine.</p>
<p>As you have discovered, I also observe moments to keep it simple.</p>
<p>But now you see, I&#8217;ve proven that it isn&#8217;t how much I said, as much as it is what I said that got you to mention it in the first place.  Yet even though you disagreed, you chose to pick that of all things.</p>
<p>Strange isn&#8217;t it?  That embodies of some of the flawed reasoning people use nowadays.  The connection is that where I come from and who I speak with, going into detail isn&#8217;t a technical foul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-december-21-25-2009/#comment-3682</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5622#comment-3682</guid>
		<description>Your logic seems to know no bounds.

If expressing yourself was taboo none of us would be posting... There is nothing wrong with doing so but when it is mostly nonsense and political ideology don&#039;t expect a &#039;free pass&#039;. Short, sweet, and to the point is much better then banter. Delibertiy short is neither ignorance or evasiveness; it is density over fluff. Politicians often spin simple questions into long ambigious answers due to ignorance, evasiveness, or a combination of both. 

Clearly I don&#039;t bottle everthing up and I have no idea what you think the connection is with regards to where I&#039;m from. Particularly since you don&#039; have a clue where that is. I do lurk though as I ussually have better things to do then debate social economic ideology with strangers on a real estate blog. Go figure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your logic seems to know no bounds.</p>
<p>If expressing yourself was taboo none of us would be posting&#8230; There is nothing wrong with doing so but when it is mostly nonsense and political ideology don&#8217;t expect a &#8216;free pass&#8217;. Short, sweet, and to the point is much better then banter. Delibertiy short is neither ignorance or evasiveness; it is density over fluff. Politicians often spin simple questions into long ambigious answers due to ignorance, evasiveness, or a combination of both. </p>
<p>Clearly I don&#8217;t bottle everthing up and I have no idea what you think the connection is with regards to where I&#8217;m from. Particularly since you don&#8217; have a clue where that is. I do lurk though as I ussually have better things to do then debate social economic ideology with strangers on a real estate blog. Go figure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-december-21-25-2009/#comment-3681</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5622#comment-3681</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

Wow, I never knew expressing yourself was so taboo nowadays!  Where I come from, being deliberately short is either ignorant or evasive.

I&#039;m glad I don&#039;t come from where you come from.  It must be so awful bottling everything up.

Captcha: &quot;you Bass&quot; (I wonder why that B was capitalized?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>Wow, I never knew expressing yourself was so taboo nowadays!  Where I come from, being deliberately short is either ignorant or evasive.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad I don&#8217;t come from where you come from.  It must be so awful bottling everything up.</p>
<p>Captcha: &#8220;you Bass&#8221; (I wonder why that B was capitalized?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-december-21-25-2009/#comment-3680</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5622#comment-3680</guid>
		<description>After the last few monologues it is nice to see Alex&#039;s nonsense down to 3 sentences...

Last winter [just under a year ago] I predicted [here] what we&#039;ve seen (5-10% drop in average price) and down to 700 homes in inventory by year end. I also predicted a peak inventory between 1500 and 1700. At the time most [on here] were claiming well over 2000 homes in inventory and huge pricing drops down to 2005-2006 levels. 

For next year I predict we&#039;ll see inventory down to 500 by May.  It&#039;ll then stay within a hundred of that either way for the remainder of the year. We&#039;ll see some slightly upward price pressure by mid year in the range of 1-3%. 

The one exception to the above is that I think there will continue to be some further downward pressure on condos. Inventory is too high and prices are still inflated compared to houses. By all rights they are 20% too high, but I only expect a modest 5-10% reduction by midyear due to cost of ownership pressures. 

Finally as was seen last year the best buys on the market are going to be in the middle class upgrade. Going from the &#039;middle&#039; of the market to a higher end home. Or from condo to a house [atleast in the near term]. 

I&#039;ll go back to lurking now. Hope everyone has a happy [and safe] New Year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the last few monologues it is nice to see Alex&#8217;s nonsense down to 3 sentences&#8230;</p>
<p>Last winter [just under a year ago] I predicted [here] what we&#8217;ve seen (5-10% drop in average price) and down to 700 homes in inventory by year end. I also predicted a peak inventory between 1500 and 1700. At the time most [on here] were claiming well over 2000 homes in inventory and huge pricing drops down to 2005-2006 levels. </p>
<p>For next year I predict we&#8217;ll see inventory down to 500 by May.  It&#8217;ll then stay within a hundred of that either way for the remainder of the year. We&#8217;ll see some slightly upward price pressure by mid year in the range of 1-3%. </p>
<p>The one exception to the above is that I think there will continue to be some further downward pressure on condos. Inventory is too high and prices are still inflated compared to houses. By all rights they are 20% too high, but I only expect a modest 5-10% reduction by midyear due to cost of ownership pressures. </p>
<p>Finally as was seen last year the best buys on the market are going to be in the middle class upgrade. Going from the &#8216;middle&#8217; of the market to a higher end home. Or from condo to a house [atleast in the near term]. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll go back to lurking now. Hope everyone has a happy [and safe] New Year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-december-21-25-2009/#comment-3679</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5622#comment-3679</guid>
		<description>The only thing Flaherty has calculated is that somehow it will benefit the rich.

If there&#039;s anything you can bank on, it&#039;s that.

The conservatives appeal to people in the most primitive of ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing Flaherty has calculated is that somehow it will benefit the rich.</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s anything you can bank on, it&#8217;s that.</p>
<p>The conservatives appeal to people in the most primitive of ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-december-21-25-2009/#comment-3678</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 02:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5622#comment-3678</guid>
		<description>By the comments from Mark Carney and Jim Flarhaty it&#039;s hard to tell if there trying to keep the current housing market heated or cool it down. Carney is warning people not to overextend themselves because interest rates are going up, gauranteed. Flarhaty is threatening to shorten amortizations and require larger downpayments. It seems to me that if I was a prospective buyer now would be the time to buy and lock in to a 5yr mortgage.
It would seem obvious that they want to keep the market heated, I don&#039;t know if there that smart or that stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the comments from Mark Carney and Jim Flarhaty it&#8217;s hard to tell if there trying to keep the current housing market heated or cool it down. Carney is warning people not to overextend themselves because interest rates are going up, gauranteed. Flarhaty is threatening to shorten amortizations and require larger downpayments. It seems to me that if I was a prospective buyer now would be the time to buy and lock in to a 5yr mortgage.<br />
It would seem obvious that they want to keep the market heated, I don&#8217;t know if there that smart or that stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Fisher</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-december-21-25-2009/#comment-3677</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 04:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5622#comment-3677</guid>
		<description>Peter,

This is not an allowable practice under Canada&#039;s Income Tax Act. CREA has been lobbying for changes that would allow this for the past few years but no luck at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,</p>
<p>This is not an allowable practice under Canada&#8217;s Income Tax Act. CREA has been lobbying for changes that would allow this for the past few years but no luck at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-december-21-25-2009/#comment-3676</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 04:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamfisher.com/?p=5622#comment-3676</guid>
		<description>This is almost more of a legal / tax question but you being a realtor perhaps you can shed some light on it Norm.  I was under the impression that when you sell a revenue property, even if you are buying a new one, you have to pay capital gains on any profit made off of the sale of the old one.  So if you bought a duplex 2004 pre-boom for $200k and sell post-boom for $400k, you have a $200k capital gain.

However, I have also heard (on american websites) of a concept of tax-deferred purchases where you roll the capital gain forward.   Basically you can just put off the taxes.  Do you know if this is possible in Canada?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is almost more of a legal / tax question but you being a realtor perhaps you can shed some light on it Norm.  I was under the impression that when you sell a revenue property, even if you are buying a new one, you have to pay capital gains on any profit made off of the sale of the old one.  So if you bought a duplex 2004 pre-boom for $200k and sell post-boom for $400k, you have a $200k capital gain.</p>
<p>However, I have also heard (on american websites) of a concept of tax-deferred purchases where you roll the capital gain forward.   Basically you can just put off the taxes.  Do you know if this is possible in Canada?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

