<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saskatoon real estate: Week in review (February 2-6 2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re bringing Saskatoon real estate to life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:41:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Fisher</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-832</guid>
		<description>Heather,

&quot;You said 0.7% is a big drop?&quot;

What I should have said was &quot;highlighted as one of the larger drops.&quot;

No, not &quot;big&quot; but it was a month-over-month drop so not peanuts either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heather,</p>
<p>&#8220;You said 0.7% is a big drop?&#8221;</p>
<p>What I should have said was &#8220;highlighted as one of the larger drops.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, not &#8220;big&#8221; but it was a month-over-month drop so not peanuts either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-831</guid>
		<description>Big M - very interesting comment from the builder.  My husband and I were considering moving up and building a new home.  We were working with a builder starting in June 08.  When the prices started dropping - we had a meeting with them in October (we had not signed a contract yet).  We new that the price of the house we owned had dropped and were asking for a similair percentage drop in the price of building a new house.  The builder told us that #1 the recession was not going to impact Saskatoon #2 that if we waited until January their lumber prices were going up and the price they were currently quoting us would rise.  

We have subsquently decided not to build at this time (although we would like to in the future)  We have decided to wait until there is a stabilization period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big M &#8211; very interesting comment from the builder.  My husband and I were considering moving up and building a new home.  We were working with a builder starting in June 08.  When the prices started dropping &#8211; we had a meeting with them in October (we had not signed a contract yet).  We new that the price of the house we owned had dropped and were asking for a similair percentage drop in the price of building a new house.  The builder told us that #1 the recession was not going to impact Saskatoon #2 that if we waited until January their lumber prices were going up and the price they were currently quoting us would rise.  </p>
<p>We have subsquently decided not to build at this time (although we would like to in the future)  We have decided to wait until there is a stabilization period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather D.</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-830</guid>
		<description>Big M,

Find yourself another builder!  LoL

Norm,

You said 0.7% is a big drop?  The way building costs have risen due to labour I&#039;d expect it&#039;ll be forced to come down at minimum 15%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big M,</p>
<p>Find yourself another builder!  LoL</p>
<p>Norm,</p>
<p>You said 0.7% is a big drop?  The way building costs have risen due to labour I&#8217;d expect it&#8217;ll be forced to come down at minimum 15%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-829</guid>
		<description>Big M, I agree, sounds like BS to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big M, I agree, sounds like BS to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-828</guid>
		<description>Big M,

I wouldn&#039;t buy into that logic, consider:

First, a relatively small component of your house cost is for lumber.  Windows, flooring, kitchen cabinets, basically all of the pre-manufactured stuff is what costs money.  Labor is also another big component which obviously won&#039;t be affected by the supply of lumber.

Second, we still have mills in Canada but they are extremely unprofitable right now and running lean.  Should supply magically increase they could increase supply.

Third, even ignoring the last 2 comments, should we need to buy lumber from the US we are going to get a good deal.  There lumber companies are in the same spot and it is a very competitive market.  Prices are not going to go up by 20 or 30% just because we have to buy from the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big M,</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t buy into that logic, consider:</p>
<p>First, a relatively small component of your house cost is for lumber.  Windows, flooring, kitchen cabinets, basically all of the pre-manufactured stuff is what costs money.  Labor is also another big component which obviously won&#8217;t be affected by the supply of lumber.</p>
<p>Second, we still have mills in Canada but they are extremely unprofitable right now and running lean.  Should supply magically increase they could increase supply.</p>
<p>Third, even ignoring the last 2 comments, should we need to buy lumber from the US we are going to get a good deal.  There lumber companies are in the same spot and it is a very competitive market.  Prices are not going to go up by 20 or 30% just because we have to buy from the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Fisher</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-827</guid>
		<description>Big M,

Hmmm. I&#039;m not an expert on lumber but I have not heard of any potential lumber shortage in Canada. If anything, I would have assumed a bit of a surplus. Most of our lumber goes to the U.S. and I don&#039;t imagine that they are buying a lot of it these days. Anyone else?

On cost of construction, this article from the Globe stating the costs have declined for the third consecutive month. Apparently, Saskatoon took a fairly large drop. Falling labour costs get the credit.

http://tinyurl.com/agobbc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big M,</p>
<p>Hmmm. I&#8217;m not an expert on lumber but I have not heard of any potential lumber shortage in Canada. If anything, I would have assumed a bit of a surplus. Most of our lumber goes to the U.S. and I don&#8217;t imagine that they are buying a lot of it these days. Anyone else?</p>
<p>On cost of construction, this article from the Globe stating the costs have declined for the third consecutive month. Apparently, Saskatoon took a fairly large drop. Falling labour costs get the credit.</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/agobbc" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/agobbc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big M</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Big M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-826</guid>
		<description>Hello,

My wife and I are first time home buyers and we really enjoy reading this blog because of all the intelligent comments and helpfull information.

We are currently looking to build a house, but given the current economic circumstances, are unsure of when to build.

I have heard (from a home builder) that as soon as lumber inventories are used up here in the city, they will have to buy lumber from the U.S (because of all the lumber mills shutting down in Canada) which will increase the price of building a house.

Is there any truth to this comment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>My wife and I are first time home buyers and we really enjoy reading this blog because of all the intelligent comments and helpfull information.</p>
<p>We are currently looking to build a house, but given the current economic circumstances, are unsure of when to build.</p>
<p>I have heard (from a home builder) that as soon as lumber inventories are used up here in the city, they will have to buy lumber from the U.S (because of all the lumber mills shutting down in Canada) which will increase the price of building a house.</p>
<p>Is there any truth to this comment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-825</guid>
		<description>I think the best thing ING taught us was to

&quot;Save Your Money&quot;

Now&#039;s not the time to be investing in real estate, or making big purchases.  How tough is it really to live within our means, let&#039;s say for one year, and take out no credit on anything, save for the mini-van needing a new transmission because it&#039;s GM build quality :)

Think any one at Cameco expected to be laid off during our &quot;boom&quot; and now over 400 laid off because of global slow down and commodity crash!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the best thing ING taught us was to</p>
<p>&#8220;Save Your Money&#8221;</p>
<p>Now&#8217;s not the time to be investing in real estate, or making big purchases.  How tough is it really to live within our means, let&#8217;s say for one year, and take out no credit on anything, save for the mini-van needing a new transmission because it&#8217;s GM build quality <img src='http://teamfisher.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Think any one at Cameco expected to be laid off during our &#8220;boom&#8221; and now over 400 laid off because of global slow down and commodity crash!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Fisher</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-824</guid>
		<description>Bookrat,

&quot;He contradicts himself:&quot;

he says he thinks the surplus inventory will be absorbed by the end of the second quarter.

Cory,

The local board owns the data. Canadians are very geeked up about privacy and that might be what primarily prevents the release of details on specific properties. That said, anyone with a ten dollar bill can find out what someone paid for a home by pulling the title.

Ringo,

Sorry, there is no way to determine that through a search of listings.

Bales,

Just did a switch to Merix (must deal with a broker). 3.75% for three years. They paid all of the fees (legal appraisal, etc) and the process has been exceptionally smooth. This particular product must fund in 45 days but may still be available when you&#039;re ready (perhaps at a lower rate). Worth looking into. I do agree with Mark&#039;s thinking on time lines and was having some reservations wondering if I should have gone five years. Instead, I&#039;m going to live like a pauper for three years and try to make some headway on my balance. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bookrat,</p>
<p>&#8220;He contradicts himself:&#8221;</p>
<p>he says he thinks the surplus inventory will be absorbed by the end of the second quarter.</p>
<p>Cory,</p>
<p>The local board owns the data. Canadians are very geeked up about privacy and that might be what primarily prevents the release of details on specific properties. That said, anyone with a ten dollar bill can find out what someone paid for a home by pulling the title.</p>
<p>Ringo,</p>
<p>Sorry, there is no way to determine that through a search of listings.</p>
<p>Bales,</p>
<p>Just did a switch to Merix (must deal with a broker). 3.75% for three years. They paid all of the fees (legal appraisal, etc) and the process has been exceptionally smooth. This particular product must fund in 45 days but may still be available when you&#8217;re ready (perhaps at a lower rate). Worth looking into. I do agree with Mark&#8217;s thinking on time lines and was having some reservations wondering if I should have gone five years. Instead, I&#8217;m going to live like a pauper for three years and try to make some headway on my balance. <img src='http://teamfisher.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookrat</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-823</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to bang the ING drum again: you can apply directly from their website, and once you are approved they guarantee that when you actually take the mortgage you will get the lowest posted rate shown between your acceptance and start date, or within 120 days of your start date (whichever is less). Their current posted rates are 4.24% for 4-year and 4.39% for 5-year. (Norm, that&#039;s down another .1% since last we spoke. How you doin&#039; with yours?)

Plus you can pay off 25% of mortgage each year, AND increase payments 25% if you choose to do so.

I have greatly enjoyed being a customer of theirs for seven years now - hassle-free and simple. (They don&#039;t have physical banks, but seemingly in compensation they have very good phone staff and an excellent website interface.)

And I second the idea of going for a longer term right now. Those with a (prime - x)% mortgage should hang on to it for dead life, but anyone asking me about renewing right now is getting my advice to lock in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to bang the ING drum again: you can apply directly from their website, and once you are approved they guarantee that when you actually take the mortgage you will get the lowest posted rate shown between your acceptance and start date, or within 120 days of your start date (whichever is less). Their current posted rates are 4.24% for 4-year and 4.39% for 5-year. (Norm, that&#8217;s down another .1% since last we spoke. How you doin&#8217; with yours?)</p>
<p>Plus you can pay off 25% of mortgage each year, AND increase payments 25% if you choose to do so.</p>
<p>I have greatly enjoyed being a customer of theirs for seven years now &#8211; hassle-free and simple. (They don&#8217;t have physical banks, but seemingly in compensation they have very good phone staff and an excellent website interface.)</p>
<p>And I second the idea of going for a longer term right now. Those with a (prime &#8211; x)% mortgage should hang on to it for dead life, but anyone asking me about renewing right now is getting my advice to lock in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ringo</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>ringo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-822</guid>
		<description>Bales - call a broker and have them monitor the rates for you. Just taking whatever the bank offers you is not a good idea. Let the broker know what features are important to you (prepayment priviledges/low payout penalties if you&#039;re planning to sell/ assumability), and they can shop around. That&#039;s what they&#039;re there for. May is far away, but the broker can usually guarantee a rate for a month or so if you need to wait to transfer your mortgage. Good luck!

Also Norm - I gotta ask. I was poking around the mls listings (in osler), and there&#039;s property listed that was built in 2007 and never lived in, still for sale. Do you have any available numbers as to how many properties that are listed (new) are THAT old?? I was unaware that there were listings that were that old. Hopefully this isn&#039;t the future??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bales &#8211; call a broker and have them monitor the rates for you. Just taking whatever the bank offers you is not a good idea. Let the broker know what features are important to you (prepayment priviledges/low payout penalties if you&#8217;re planning to sell/ assumability), and they can shop around. That&#8217;s what they&#8217;re there for. May is far away, but the broker can usually guarantee a rate for a month or so if you need to wait to transfer your mortgage. Good luck!</p>
<p>Also Norm &#8211; I gotta ask. I was poking around the mls listings (in osler), and there&#8217;s property listed that was built in 2007 and never lived in, still for sale. Do you have any available numbers as to how many properties that are listed (new) are THAT old?? I was unaware that there were listings that were that old. Hopefully this isn&#8217;t the future??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-821</guid>
		<description>IMHO, your best bet is a four or five year mortgage.  A one year would be a bad idea I think.  Rates may stay low all year until you have to renew, but they may not, and they are only heading higher.  And in two years, we may have a lot of inflation and they might be 8 or 9 percent.

Remember, Bank of Canada determineds prime rates, which only &#039;help&#039; determine variable mortgages, which are tied to prime rates at banks.  All other fixed mortgages take their cue from the larger bond market.  They have to compete with, say, all those treasury bonds being issued in the States.  Some fear this will send bond yields very high, meaning mortgage yields will have to follow, meaning higher rates.  The Fed Reserve in the US has hinted it may fight this by buying it&#039;s own long term bonds back, but it&#039;s an unpredictable affair.  Fixed four and five year rates are as low as they&#039;ll likely get.  And much, much safer than a variable or 1 year fixed.  Those are my thoughts.  But I think most on here will agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO, your best bet is a four or five year mortgage.  A one year would be a bad idea I think.  Rates may stay low all year until you have to renew, but they may not, and they are only heading higher.  And in two years, we may have a lot of inflation and they might be 8 or 9 percent.</p>
<p>Remember, Bank of Canada determineds prime rates, which only &#8216;help&#8217; determine variable mortgages, which are tied to prime rates at banks.  All other fixed mortgages take their cue from the larger bond market.  They have to compete with, say, all those treasury bonds being issued in the States.  Some fear this will send bond yields very high, meaning mortgage yields will have to follow, meaning higher rates.  The Fed Reserve in the US has hinted it may fight this by buying it&#8217;s own long term bonds back, but it&#8217;s an unpredictable affair.  Fixed four and five year rates are as low as they&#8217;ll likely get.  And much, much safer than a variable or 1 year fixed.  Those are my thoughts.  But I think most on here will agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bales</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Bales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-820</guid>
		<description>Hello guys and gals, been reading the blog pretty religiously now for the last couple months, thanks norm for hosting and for mediating the forum when need be. I only wish there was a forum like this available in other cities with people willing to contribute.  

Anyways without going into to many details about my situation my question is this. My mortgage is up for renewal may 1st. Bank of Canada will most likely cut rates in March. Right now my interest is fixed at 4.25 through TD which says I could get a one year now at 3.75. However a bank of Canada announcement cutting rates does not necessarily lower bank prime. With bankruptcies starting to rise I am skeptical whether a buyers morgage rates can get any better. March 20 is a long way away these days. Your thoughts, I am interested to hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello guys and gals, been reading the blog pretty religiously now for the last couple months, thanks norm for hosting and for mediating the forum when need be. I only wish there was a forum like this available in other cities with people willing to contribute.  </p>
<p>Anyways without going into to many details about my situation my question is this. My mortgage is up for renewal may 1st. Bank of Canada will most likely cut rates in March. Right now my interest is fixed at 4.25 through TD which says I could get a one year now at 3.75. However a bank of Canada announcement cutting rates does not necessarily lower bank prime. With bankruptcies starting to rise I am skeptical whether a buyers morgage rates can get any better. March 20 is a long way away these days. Your thoughts, I am interested to hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crikey</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-819</guid>
		<description>&quot;the recession so far isn&#039;t as quite as bad as some headlines may suggest.&quot;

No, not so far.

I think the apparent acceleration of job losses is what&#039;s most concerning. Good point, though, the reporting of these unemployment numbers do not tend to be reported proportionally. Percentages should be what we&#039;re concerned about, not raw numbers. I saw an intereting set of graphs the other day that show the current unemployment numbers adjusted for population (US only, sorry):

http://tinyurl.com/crz3bd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the recession so far isn&#8217;t as quite as bad as some headlines may suggest.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, not so far.</p>
<p>I think the apparent acceleration of job losses is what&#8217;s most concerning. Good point, though, the reporting of these unemployment numbers do not tend to be reported proportionally. Percentages should be what we&#8217;re concerned about, not raw numbers. I saw an intereting set of graphs the other day that show the current unemployment numbers adjusted for population (US only, sorry):</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/crz3bd" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/crz3bd</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-818</guid>
		<description>I will.  Pretty basic, usually come out at start of each month for previous month.

http://www.reginarealtors.com/ourservices-marketstatistics.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will.  Pretty basic, usually come out at start of each month for previous month.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reginarealtors.com/ourservices-marketstatistics.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.reginarealtors.com/ourservices-marketstatistics.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodge</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-817</guid>
		<description>Cory, SRAR and others have monthly stats available on line.  Sure some one will post the links for you shortly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cory, SRAR and others have monthly stats available on line.  Sure some one will post the links for you shortly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-816</guid>
		<description>(Mark, are you buying all the low-end properties, bringing the sale price down? :-)

Sigh, yes, someone has to do it.  All part of my carefully plotted path towards bankruptcy. :)

&quot;It looks as if Mr. Market just can&#039;t see the recently announced bank bailout plan working either:&quot;

Mr. Market is fickle.  We&#039;ll see how he likest the 2 trillion in guarantess etc. a few months down the road.

Also, keep in mind, the recession so far isn&#039;t as quite as bad as some headlines may suggest.  I know there&#039;s been a lot of Great Depression talk (though less in the last few months) but we&#039;re still not seeing the kind of job losses proportionally that we were hit with in the early 80s.  Provided, you adjust for the larger work force.  

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090207.RJOBSLAGGING07/TPStory/?query=recession</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Mark, are you buying all the low-end properties, bringing the sale price down? <img src='http://teamfisher.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Sigh, yes, someone has to do it.  All part of my carefully plotted path towards bankruptcy. <img src='http://teamfisher.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;It looks as if Mr. Market just can&#8217;t see the recently announced bank bailout plan working either:&#8221;</p>
<p>Mr. Market is fickle.  We&#8217;ll see how he likest the 2 trillion in guarantess etc. a few months down the road.</p>
<p>Also, keep in mind, the recession so far isn&#8217;t as quite as bad as some headlines may suggest.  I know there&#8217;s been a lot of Great Depression talk (though less in the last few months) but we&#8217;re still not seeing the kind of job losses proportionally that we were hit with in the early 80s.  Provided, you adjust for the larger work force.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090207.RJOBSLAGGING07/TPStory/?query=recession" rel="nofollow">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090207.RJOBSLAGGING07/TPStory/?query=recession</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodge Man</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodge Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-815</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t Dave Dodge, former Bank of Canada head and now no political commitment, say that he thought it would be at least 3 years before the economy recovered?

Harper probably told Carney what to say or at least what he was allowed to!

Interesting that Carney&#039;s predecessor has such a pesimistic outlook for the next 3 years.  That has to say something about Canada&#039;s economic prospects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Dave Dodge, former Bank of Canada head and now no political commitment, say that he thought it would be at least 3 years before the economy recovered?</p>
<p>Harper probably told Carney what to say or at least what he was allowed to!</p>
<p>Interesting that Carney&#8217;s predecessor has such a pesimistic outlook for the next 3 years.  That has to say something about Canada&#8217;s economic prospects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-814</guid>
		<description>Mark,

I am one of the Reginan&#039;s you were referring to. I read that article on the LP&#039;s website last night. I&#039;m not too sure what to think of it. I doubt Mr. Archibald would outright lie and say the average for February so far is $235,000 so I can see that. What bothered me a little was how we only get any type of analysis from the him when the news is bad. FOr example, if the average was pushed higher in January because of several Wascana View properties selling at over a million, I don&#039;t think he would have been as quite to point out the reasoning.

I suppose it&#039;s his job to make things appear positive though. However I truly wish that the general public would have access to more information on housing.

Norm, forgive my ignorance, but is the MLS data owned by Realtors? Is there any way that an individual could gain access to the data on homes? Has there ever been a push in the industry to provide the public with more information? I fully understand many of the reasons why the public does not have access to the information, but just wondering if the topic has ever been discussed.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>I am one of the Reginan&#8217;s you were referring to. I read that article on the LP&#8217;s website last night. I&#8217;m not too sure what to think of it. I doubt Mr. Archibald would outright lie and say the average for February so far is $235,000 so I can see that. What bothered me a little was how we only get any type of analysis from the him when the news is bad. FOr example, if the average was pushed higher in January because of several Wascana View properties selling at over a million, I don&#8217;t think he would have been as quite to point out the reasoning.</p>
<p>I suppose it&#8217;s his job to make things appear positive though. However I truly wish that the general public would have access to more information on housing.</p>
<p>Norm, forgive my ignorance, but is the MLS data owned by Realtors? Is there any way that an individual could gain access to the data on homes? Has there ever been a push in the industry to provide the public with more information? I fully understand many of the reasons why the public does not have access to the information, but just wondering if the topic has ever been discussed.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookrat</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-813</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-813</guid>
		<description>The things that struck me from Mark&#039;s Leader Post article:

&quot;Our supply levels are about double what they normally are. Inside the city, we’ve got over 800 listings.&quot; -- Gee, is that all? Saskatoon hasn&#039;t been near 800 listings for almost a year now, so kwitcherbitchin!

He contradicts himself: &quot;[The buyer is] in a better position.&quot; &quot;There’s lots of choice out there right now. We’re not seeing the same kind of upward pressure on prices.&quot; but &quot;...the average is expected to rise slightly through the year.&quot; So, which is it - high inventory/buyer&#039;s market, or prices going up? Doesn&#039;t make sense to have both.

Lastly, I found it interesting that the Regina average was &#039;anomalous&#039; on the low side due to the mix of low-end homes sold... while Saskatoon had 8 homes in excess of half a mil. I know one month&#039;s sales do not a pattern make, but it&#039;s always odd to see divergences like this. (Mark, are you buying all the low-end properties, bringing the sale price down? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The things that struck me from Mark&#8217;s Leader Post article:</p>
<p>&#8220;Our supply levels are about double what they normally are. Inside the city, we’ve got over 800 listings.&#8221; &#8212; Gee, is that all? Saskatoon hasn&#8217;t been near 800 listings for almost a year now, so kwitcherbitchin!</p>
<p>He contradicts himself: &#8220;[The buyer is] in a better position.&#8221; &#8220;There’s lots of choice out there right now. We’re not seeing the same kind of upward pressure on prices.&#8221; but &#8220;&#8230;the average is expected to rise slightly through the year.&#8221; So, which is it &#8211; high inventory/buyer&#8217;s market, or prices going up? Doesn&#8217;t make sense to have both.</p>
<p>Lastly, I found it interesting that the Regina average was &#8216;anomalous&#8217; on the low side due to the mix of low-end homes sold&#8230; while Saskatoon had 8 homes in excess of half a mil. I know one month&#8217;s sales do not a pattern make, but it&#8217;s always odd to see divergences like this. (Mark, are you buying all the low-end properties, bringing the sale price down? <img src='http://teamfisher.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crikey</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-812</guid>
		<description>&quot;I just do not see it&quot;.

George, I&#039;m with you. Considering so many of our exports go to the US, it&#039;s getting ever scarier. It looks as if Mr. Market just can&#039;t see the recently announced bank bailout plan working either:

Geithner Says Bank-Rescue Plans May Reach $2 Trillion

http://tinyurl.com/b2uz6h

This is supposed to be seperate from the US economic stimulus package? I&#039;d like some of what Mr. Carney is smoking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I just do not see it&#8221;.</p>
<p>George, I&#8217;m with you. Considering so many of our exports go to the US, it&#8217;s getting ever scarier. It looks as if Mr. Market just can&#8217;t see the recently announced bank bailout plan working either:</p>
<p>Geithner Says Bank-Rescue Plans May Reach $2 Trillion</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/b2uz6h" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/b2uz6h</a></p>
<p>This is supposed to be seperate from the US economic stimulus package? I&#8217;d like some of what Mr. Carney is smoking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-811</guid>
		<description>For those in Regina (i think there&#039;s a few of us living vicariously through Norm&#039;s blog) the average price in January was 213,000.  The realtor&#039;s association claims it is so much lower than 240,000 in December due to &#039;mix of properties sold&#039;.  Many lower end homes.  Maybe.  Apparantly we&#039;re averaging 235,000 on the 60 sales so far in February.

http://www.leaderpost.com/business/Regina+home+sales+expected+decline/1271117/story.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those in Regina (i think there&#8217;s a few of us living vicariously through Norm&#8217;s blog) the average price in January was 213,000.  The realtor&#8217;s association claims it is so much lower than 240,000 in December due to &#8216;mix of properties sold&#8217;.  Many lower end homes.  Maybe.  Apparantly we&#8217;re averaging 235,000 on the 60 sales so far in February.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.leaderpost.com/business/Regina+home+sales+expected+decline/1271117/story.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.leaderpost.com/business/Regina+home+sales+expected+decline/1271117/story.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-810</guid>
		<description>Carney still sees economic rebound next year

http://news.sympatico.msn.ctv.ca/abc/home/contentposting.aspx?isfa=1&amp;feedname=CTV-TOPSTORIES_V3&amp;showbyline=True&amp;date=true&amp;newsitemid=CTVNews%2f20090210%2fcarney_economy_090210

&quot;We don&#039;t do optimism; we don&#039;t do pessimism; we do realism at the Bank of Canada,&quot; Carney told MPs. &quot;We don&#039;t do spin.&quot;

More than anything I would love for him to be right, I just do not see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carney still sees economic rebound next year</p>
<p><a href="http://news.sympatico.msn.ctv.ca/abc/home/contentposting.aspx?isfa=1&#038;feedname=CTV-TOPSTORIES_V3&#038;showbyline=True&#038;date=true&#038;newsitemid=CTVNews%2f20090210%2fcarney_economy_090210" rel="nofollow">http://news.sympatico.msn.ctv.ca/abc/home/contentposting.aspx?isfa=1&#038;feedname=CTV-TOPSTORIES_V3&#038;showbyline=True&#038;date=true&#038;newsitemid=CTVNews%2f20090210%2fcarney_economy_090210</a></p>
<p>&#8220;We don&#8217;t do optimism; we don&#8217;t do pessimism; we do realism at the Bank of Canada,&#8221; Carney told MPs. &#8220;We don&#8217;t do spin.&#8221;</p>
<p>More than anything I would love for him to be right, I just do not see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Fisher</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-809</guid>
		<description>Disgruntled, Drinking and Nick,

Sorry, but we&#039;re not having this conversation again here. We&#039;re here to discuss real estate, not real estate agents. If you have an issue with another agent&#039;s behavior please take your complaint directly to that person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disgruntled, Drinking and Nick,</p>
<p>Sorry, but we&#8217;re not having this conversation again here. We&#8217;re here to discuss real estate, not real estate agents. If you have an issue with another agent&#8217;s behavior please take your complaint directly to that person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meo</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-february-2-6-2009/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>meo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1455#comment-808</guid>
		<description>Norm, Matt, Jason, &amp; Crikey:

Thank you all for your very wonderful advice. I think I&#039;ve convinced the hubby to hang in there for a bit longer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norm, Matt, Jason, &amp; Crikey:</p>
<p>Thank you all for your very wonderful advice. I think I&#8217;ve convinced the hubby to hang in there for a bit longer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

