<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saskatoon real estate: Week in review (January 12-16 2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re bringing Saskatoon real estate to life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:41:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don &#38; Patty Klassen</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Don &#38; Patty Klassen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-437</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard so much about this Fisher guy. Really refreshing reading your blogs. No comment in particular on the &#039;subject&#039;...just wanted to say how much we enjoy your site.

All the best from the &#039;wet coast&#039;.

Regards - Don &amp; Patty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard so much about this Fisher guy. Really refreshing reading your blogs. No comment in particular on the &#8216;subject&#8217;&#8230;just wanted to say how much we enjoy your site.</p>
<p>All the best from the &#8216;wet coast&#8217;.</p>
<p>Regards &#8211; Don &amp; Patty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confused</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>Confused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-436</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or is this whole downtown condo/loft thing backwards? Lofts and such in undesirable downtown areas arose from the ability to purchase a relatively inexpensive piece of property. These areas in larger cities (New York, LA, Paris)... all became trendy/cool because so many young people could finally afford something. Starting from nothing and trying to develop a trend and charge a premium for it is completely insane. You can&#039;t start off with high end units (River landing project excused) because there really is no draw to living in downtown Saskatoon, I would also argue that there is no draw to having a condo on the west bank of the river either when all the views are from the East side looking downtown. Developers should instead focus on inexpensive loft style units along 23rd and 24th street first. Build the downtown population and the attraction and trend will grow from that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or is this whole downtown condo/loft thing backwards? Lofts and such in undesirable downtown areas arose from the ability to purchase a relatively inexpensive piece of property. These areas in larger cities (New York, LA, Paris)&#8230; all became trendy/cool because so many young people could finally afford something. Starting from nothing and trying to develop a trend and charge a premium for it is completely insane. You can&#8217;t start off with high end units (River landing project excused) because there really is no draw to living in downtown Saskatoon, I would also argue that there is no draw to having a condo on the west bank of the river either when all the views are from the East side looking downtown. Developers should instead focus on inexpensive loft style units along 23rd and 24th street first. Build the downtown population and the attraction and trend will grow from that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guy_in_regina</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>guy_in_regina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-435</guid>
		<description>Radio Gal,

e-mail sent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radio Gal,</p>
<p>e-mail sent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radio Gal</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Radio Gal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-434</guid>
		<description>guy_in_regina --

Not to be impatient, but you should get in touch with me. It&#039;s Sunday. I&#039;m not working again until Thursday, and I have some information I think you&#039;d like to know (and at the same time, you can help me).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guy_in_regina &#8211;</p>
<p>Not to be impatient, but you should get in touch with me. It&#8217;s Sunday. I&#8217;m not working again until Thursday, and I have some information I think you&#8217;d like to know (and at the same time, you can help me).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Fisher</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Sue,

There is no way, unless the seller or the seller&#039;s agent are willing to tell you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sue,</p>
<p>There is no way, unless the seller or the seller&#8217;s agent are willing to tell you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-432</guid>
		<description>Is there any way to tell how many offers a listed property has got?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any way to tell how many offers a listed property has got?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Fisher</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-431</guid>
		<description>Chartist,

Thanks for the kind words and thank you for reading.

George has a job that requires some travel and I think it&#039;s difficult for him to get here when he&#039;s away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chartist,</p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words and thank you for reading.</p>
<p>George has a job that requires some travel and I think it&#8217;s difficult for him to get here when he&#8217;s away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wesco</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>wesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-430</guid>
		<description>Yeah where is George of the internet jungle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah where is George of the internet jungle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Chartist</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Chartist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Norm, just wanted to take time out and thank you for a great blog. Without it, I wouldn&#039;t know what the heck is going in Saskatoon or the rest of province.

I never formerly introduced myself, but have posted a few times. I&#039;m originally from Florida, but have spent the last six years in Regina. Why you ask? You&#039;ll have to ask my wife who has lived here all her life. :) I&#039;ved watched this property/commodity/equity runup over the years and it is without a shadow of a doubt bubble mania. Unfortunately, this province is not immune.

I appreciate everyone who posts and wonder where George has been? You know, everyone has a point of view, so lets take it all in and respect one another. Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norm, just wanted to take time out and thank you for a great blog. Without it, I wouldn&#8217;t know what the heck is going in Saskatoon or the rest of province.</p>
<p>I never formerly introduced myself, but have posted a few times. I&#8217;m originally from Florida, but have spent the last six years in Regina. Why you ask? You&#8217;ll have to ask my wife who has lived here all her life. <img src='http://teamfisher.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I&#8217;ved watched this property/commodity/equity runup over the years and it is without a shadow of a doubt bubble mania. Unfortunately, this province is not immune.</p>
<p>I appreciate everyone who posts and wonder where George has been? You know, everyone has a point of view, so lets take it all in and respect one another. Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crikey</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Someone asked further up the thread if there were any &quot;goodies&quot; for Saskatchewan with the upcoming taxpayer funded spend-a-thon. I&#039;m not sure if this counts- this may have been in the works for some time:

Sask. gets $25 million for innovation and economic development

http://tinyurl.com/cbcgbq

The provincial government will match those funds, for a total investment of $50 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone asked further up the thread if there were any &#8220;goodies&#8221; for Saskatchewan with the upcoming taxpayer funded spend-a-thon. I&#8217;m not sure if this counts- this may have been in the works for some time:</p>
<p>Sask. gets $25 million for innovation and economic development</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/cbcgbq" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/cbcgbq</a></p>
<p>The provincial government will match those funds, for a total investment of $50 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-427</guid>
		<description>http://www.thestarphoenix.com/opinion/letters/Citizens+lack+manners/1213675/story.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thestarphoenix.com/opinion/letters/Citizens+lack+manners/1213675/story.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thestarphoenix.com/opinion/letters/Citizens+lack+manners/1213675/story.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-426</guid>
		<description>&quot;With no rent control in place, you may find that your rent increase is unreasonable if the landlord is ticked off with you.&quot;

(Ah, yes:  the logic of not having rent controls.  [shakes head])

That&#039;s what Saskatchewan badly needs, but will never get: managed rent increase legislation of some [ANY] kind.  *Some* sort of sanity so landlords can&#039;t just raise the rent to whatever level they want without any justification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;With no rent control in place, you may find that your rent increase is unreasonable if the landlord is ticked off with you.&#8221;</p>
<p>(Ah, yes:  the logic of not having rent controls.  [shakes head])</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what Saskatchewan badly needs, but will never get: managed rent increase legislation of some [ANY] kind.  *Some* sort of sanity so landlords can&#8217;t just raise the rent to whatever level they want without any justification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-425</guid>
		<description>leaseholder,

If there are no clear terms, then the landlord shouldn&#039;t be able to implement a new rule like extra rent for extra people without some notice. I&#039;ve been in that situation, where I was presented with a RETROACTIVE $50/month &#039;utility fee&#039; for the air conditioner I&#039;d installed months previously to try to keep my naturally +40C apartment in the +30&#039;s. I refused to pay, since it was never mentioned and was not in the terms of our agreement, so I (and only I) was then handed notice of an equivalent rent increase. I moved out soon after it took effect. Too bad for them... I paid my rent with post-dated cheques, got rid of the cockroaches in my unit (that I was told about the day I moved in), and never caused any maintenance or noise problems. Landlords often infringe on tenant&#039;s rights, intentionally or not. Here&#039;s some more reading:

http://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en/co/reho/yogureho/fash/fash_012.cfm

It&#039;s good to know your rights, but try to be diplomatic; you may win this battle, only to find that the landlord exercises his right to raise the rent with notice. With no rent control in place, you may find that your rent increase is unreasonable if the landlord is ticked off with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>leaseholder,</p>
<p>If there are no clear terms, then the landlord shouldn&#8217;t be able to implement a new rule like extra rent for extra people without some notice. I&#8217;ve been in that situation, where I was presented with a RETROACTIVE $50/month &#8216;utility fee&#8217; for the air conditioner I&#8217;d installed months previously to try to keep my naturally +40C apartment in the +30&#8242;s. I refused to pay, since it was never mentioned and was not in the terms of our agreement, so I (and only I) was then handed notice of an equivalent rent increase. I moved out soon after it took effect. Too bad for them&#8230; I paid my rent with post-dated cheques, got rid of the cockroaches in my unit (that I was told about the day I moved in), and never caused any maintenance or noise problems. Landlords often infringe on tenant&#8217;s rights, intentionally or not. Here&#8217;s some more reading:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en/co/reho/yogureho/fash/fash_012.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en/co/reho/yogureho/fash/fash_012.cfm</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to know your rights, but try to be diplomatic; you may win this battle, only to find that the landlord exercises his right to raise the rent with notice. With no rent control in place, you may find that your rent increase is unreasonable if the landlord is ticked off with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motivated!!</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Motivated!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-424</guid>
		<description>Certainly I would have appreciated a voice of reason when I bought my condo at a premium last year.  My work place has down sized, and I am being sent back to Calgary.  Unfortunately, my condo which is listed well under what I paid for it just won&#039;t sell against all the competition out there.  It is a difficult time to be a seller in Saskatoon.  It appears this market will only get worse.  But to take an even larger loss on this sale is so difficult.  Holding onto hope that I can get away with just a moderate loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly I would have appreciated a voice of reason when I bought my condo at a premium last year.  My work place has down sized, and I am being sent back to Calgary.  Unfortunately, my condo which is listed well under what I paid for it just won&#8217;t sell against all the competition out there.  It is a difficult time to be a seller in Saskatoon.  It appears this market will only get worse.  But to take an even larger loss on this sale is so difficult.  Holding onto hope that I can get away with just a moderate loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-423</guid>
		<description>Sorry to burst your bubble avid, we can&#039;t all be housing boosters, and I think all those people who bought houses/condos here in the spring, and now have neighbouring units for $50,000 less would have appreciated having a level voice of reason in the spring to talk them out of it.  With the inventory the way it is, and more condos on the way, I&#039;d say another $50,000 (15%) drop isn&#039;t out of the question.  Really sucks for those who bought at peak.  Still not great to buy a specu-condo now.

Sorry, for you Avid, everything is awesome.  Saskatoon does not lead Canada in violent crime, has every bit as much services as bigger more affordable cities and housing prices must have bottomed out because other realtors tell us to buy now or be &quot;sorry&quot;!  Maybe you should hang out at the Chamber of Commerce if you want always positive, though often inaccurate, boosters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to burst your bubble avid, we can&#8217;t all be housing boosters, and I think all those people who bought houses/condos here in the spring, and now have neighbouring units for $50,000 less would have appreciated having a level voice of reason in the spring to talk them out of it.  With the inventory the way it is, and more condos on the way, I&#8217;d say another $50,000 (15%) drop isn&#8217;t out of the question.  Really sucks for those who bought at peak.  Still not great to buy a specu-condo now.</p>
<p>Sorry, for you Avid, everything is awesome.  Saskatoon does not lead Canada in violent crime, has every bit as much services as bigger more affordable cities and housing prices must have bottomed out because other realtors tell us to buy now or be &#8220;sorry&#8221;!  Maybe you should hang out at the Chamber of Commerce if you want always positive, though often inaccurate, boosters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guy_in_regina</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>guy_in_regina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-422</guid>
		<description>aLeaseHolder,

Check to see if there are any regulations associated with the Act.  Usually Acts are sparse on specifics; the details are spelled out in Regulations.

Good luck!  

Radio Gal,

I&#039;ll drop you a line this weekend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aLeaseHolder,</p>
<p>Check to see if there are any regulations associated with the Act.  Usually Acts are sparse on specifics; the details are spelled out in Regulations.</p>
<p>Good luck!  </p>
<p>Radio Gal,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll drop you a line this weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aLeaseHolder</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>aLeaseHolder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-421</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Norm and Heather.

If there is no clear terms in the lease about how much should be charged for the additional occupant, can the manager decide the amount just as s/he likes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Norm and Heather.</p>
<p>If there is no clear terms in the lease about how much should be charged for the additional occupant, can the manager decide the amount just as s/he likes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-420</guid>
		<description>Leaseholder, unfortunately it looks like Norm is probably right; you landlord can limit occupancy, or change extra rent for extra occupants IF it&#039;s specified in your lease. Check your lease to see if it limits how many people can live in your unit.

Otherwise, if your lease doesn&#039;t set specific limits, the wording of the act is pretty vague, saying that the landlord has the right to limit occupancy to a &#039;resonable&#039; number, but cannot refuse to allow guests under &#039;reasonable&#039; circumstances. Good luck!

You can read the act here: http://www.qp.gov.sk.ca/documents/english/Statutes/Statutes/R22-0001.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leaseholder, unfortunately it looks like Norm is probably right; you landlord can limit occupancy, or change extra rent for extra occupants IF it&#8217;s specified in your lease. Check your lease to see if it limits how many people can live in your unit.</p>
<p>Otherwise, if your lease doesn&#8217;t set specific limits, the wording of the act is pretty vague, saying that the landlord has the right to limit occupancy to a &#8216;resonable&#8217; number, but cannot refuse to allow guests under &#8216;reasonable&#8217; circumstances. Good luck!</p>
<p>You can read the act here: <a href="http://www.qp.gov.sk.ca/documents/english/Statutes/Statutes/R22-0001.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.qp.gov.sk.ca/documents/english/Statutes/Statutes/R22-0001.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Fisher</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-419</guid>
		<description>LeaseHolder,

You can always inquire with the Office of the Rentalsman regarding your rights but I expect your lease details who has a right to live there, and probably some reference to how many people. As far as I know, the landlord does probably have a legal right to limit the number of people staying there. Obviously, in your case it sounds a little less than compassionate. If the parent is not actually &quot;living there&quot; but visiting, the rules may be different. I would call the Rentalsman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LeaseHolder,</p>
<p>You can always inquire with the Office of the Rentalsman regarding your rights but I expect your lease details who has a right to live there, and probably some reference to how many people. As far as I know, the landlord does probably have a legal right to limit the number of people staying there. Obviously, in your case it sounds a little less than compassionate. If the parent is not actually &#8220;living there&#8221; but visiting, the rules may be different. I would call the Rentalsman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aLeaseHolder</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>aLeaseHolder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-418</guid>
		<description>I am now renting an two-bedroom apartment. And got a notice from the building manager that I need to pay money for my visitors (my parent who come to help take care of my baby). And the amount is the rent fee divided by four. They said the reason for this is that &quot;the apartment is supposed to be lived by four&quot;. But now the people lived in the apartment is only 4 include my parent.

I wonder who knows any laws or regulation about such situations. I really doubt if the occupant of my parent should be restrict by the manager.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am now renting an two-bedroom apartment. And got a notice from the building manager that I need to pay money for my visitors (my parent who come to help take care of my baby). And the amount is the rent fee divided by four. They said the reason for this is that &#8220;the apartment is supposed to be lived by four&#8221;. But now the people lived in the apartment is only 4 include my parent.</p>
<p>I wonder who knows any laws or regulation about such situations. I really doubt if the occupant of my parent should be restrict by the manager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radio Gal</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Radio Gal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-417</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Sorry to drop in on the blog. I&#039;ve been following it, but have never posted, however, a couple of recent posts have intrigued me. I work for CBC Radio and I&#039;ve been looking into some stories about housing and the boom.

Guy_in_Regina,

I would love to talk to you about the cancellation of your rent increase, and whether others in your building have experienced the same thing.

Wesco,

I would love to talk to you about the situation in Fort McMurray, with people returning to Saskatchewan for jobs.

By talking to me, you&#039;re not agreeing to an interview or anything, but I&#039;d just like to learn more about your posts and what you&#039;re both seeing/experiencing.

I&#039;d appreciate you contacting me -- I can be reached by phone at 306-347-9711, or by e-mail at Sheryl.Rennie@cbc.ca

P.S. Norm -- I enjoy the blog. Thanks for having the venue for people to post and comment...and not just because it helps me with stories!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Sorry to drop in on the blog. I&#8217;ve been following it, but have never posted, however, a couple of recent posts have intrigued me. I work for CBC Radio and I&#8217;ve been looking into some stories about housing and the boom.</p>
<p>Guy_in_Regina,</p>
<p>I would love to talk to you about the cancellation of your rent increase, and whether others in your building have experienced the same thing.</p>
<p>Wesco,</p>
<p>I would love to talk to you about the situation in Fort McMurray, with people returning to Saskatchewan for jobs.</p>
<p>By talking to me, you&#8217;re not agreeing to an interview or anything, but I&#8217;d just like to learn more about your posts and what you&#8217;re both seeing/experiencing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d appreciate you contacting me &#8212; I can be reached by phone at 306-347-9711, or by e-mail at <a href="mailto:Sheryl.Rennie@cbc.ca">Sheryl.Rennie@cbc.ca</a></p>
<p>P.S. Norm &#8212; I enjoy the blog. Thanks for having the venue for people to post and comment&#8230;and not just because it helps me with stories!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crikey</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-416</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting article about retail sales. Here&#039;s the rub:

&quot;But Elliott has also noted heavy borrowing by upbeat Saskatchewan consumers resulted in increases in spending that were not matched by increased personal incomes.&quot;

Whoops!

Inflation data was also released this morning:

http://tinyurl.com/apwucb

&quot;OTTAWA — Plunging gasoline prices and reluctant consumers with a wary eye on the recession are driving Canada&#039;s inflation rate into negative territory.

Consumer prices fell 0.7 per cent in December from a month earlier, the third month in a row for generalized price declines, and the fourth contraction in five months.&quot;

Annual inflation rate in Saskatchewan (Previous month in brackets):

Saskatchewan 2.6 (3.2)

All provinces and territories:

http://tinyurl.com/dc7sws

Also of note:

Oil sands layoffs coming down pipeline

http://tinyurl.com/bypnbh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting article about retail sales. Here&#8217;s the rub:</p>
<p>&#8220;But Elliott has also noted heavy borrowing by upbeat Saskatchewan consumers resulted in increases in spending that were not matched by increased personal incomes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Whoops!</p>
<p>Inflation data was also released this morning:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/apwucb" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/apwucb</a></p>
<p>&#8220;OTTAWA — Plunging gasoline prices and reluctant consumers with a wary eye on the recession are driving Canada&#8217;s inflation rate into negative territory.</p>
<p>Consumer prices fell 0.7 per cent in December from a month earlier, the third month in a row for generalized price declines, and the fourth contraction in five months.&#8221;</p>
<p>Annual inflation rate in Saskatchewan (Previous month in brackets):</p>
<p>Saskatchewan 2.6 (3.2)</p>
<p>All provinces and territories:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/dc7sws" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/dc7sws</a></p>
<p>Also of note:</p>
<p>Oil sands layoffs coming down pipeline</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/bypnbh" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/bypnbh</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Fisher</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-415</guid>
		<description>In the news.

Record earnings for Potash Corp - profits triple in 2008 over previous year. PCS plans to proceed with their expansion plan starting with investments of nearly 2 billion dollars in 2009.

http://tinyurl.com/ad7g28

Non-residential construction in Saskatoon increased 18% in Saskatoon to a record $557 million. Meanwhile, residential construction slowed by 5% to 1,589 units.

http://tinyurl.com/chjaff

Retail sales cool in Sask. - &quot;Doug Elliott, who publishes the Sask Trends Monitor newsletter, updated statements made at the height of the Saskatchewan spending boom that people were spending money like the proverbial drunken sailor. People are now just spending money &quot;like slightly inebriated sailors,&quot; Elliott offered in an interview Thursday.&quot;

http://tinyurl.com/cyc2l8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the news.</p>
<p>Record earnings for Potash Corp &#8211; profits triple in 2008 over previous year. PCS plans to proceed with their expansion plan starting with investments of nearly 2 billion dollars in 2009.</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/ad7g28" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ad7g28</a></p>
<p>Non-residential construction in Saskatoon increased 18% in Saskatoon to a record $557 million. Meanwhile, residential construction slowed by 5% to 1,589 units.</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/chjaff" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/chjaff</a></p>
<p>Retail sales cool in Sask. &#8211; &#8220;Doug Elliott, who publishes the Sask Trends Monitor newsletter, updated statements made at the height of the Saskatchewan spending boom that people were spending money like the proverbial drunken sailor. People are now just spending money &#8220;like slightly inebriated sailors,&#8221; Elliott offered in an interview Thursday.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/cyc2l8" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/cyc2l8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather D.</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-414</guid>
		<description>Norm/Brian S,

Well I&#039;m glad those builders forfeit a $15K deposit at least, too bad it goes back to the city - should be divvied up between those who didn&#039;t get a pick!  ;&#039;)

I doubt the preferred list will really matter this time around with so many lots and less interest.  I&#039;m interested to see though which ones sell first, the smaller lots or walk-out basement lots.  The latter has been most popular in the past... but things might be different.  Perhaps with the &quot;r&quot; word on everyone&#039;s lips some will reconsider their McMansions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norm/Brian S,</p>
<p>Well I&#8217;m glad those builders forfeit a $15K deposit at least, too bad it goes back to the city &#8211; should be divvied up between those who didn&#8217;t get a pick!  ;&#8217;)</p>
<p>I doubt the preferred list will really matter this time around with so many lots and less interest.  I&#8217;m interested to see though which ones sell first, the smaller lots or walk-out basement lots.  The latter has been most popular in the past&#8230; but things might be different.  Perhaps with the &#8220;r&#8221; word on everyone&#8217;s lips some will reconsider their McMansions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookrat</title>
		<link>http://teamfisher.com/saskatoon-real-estate-week-in-review-january-12-16-2009/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normfisher.ca/?p=1447#comment-413</guid>
		<description>&quot;Perhaps a disadvantage of all of the positive press we&#039;ve seen over the past two years?&quot;

MHO, more a disadvantage that the province gives the federal Conservatives 13 of 14 seats every election come hell or high water.

- When the Libs are in power, why bother? We (collectively) don&#039;t give them any seats regardless of how much they offer us.

- When the Cons are in power, why bother? We (collectively) give them seats regardless of how little they offer us.

Face it, democracies are the same everywhere; it&#039;s the swing ridings that get the pork from both sides, while electorates that are solidly in the pocket (or solidly out of reach) get ignored.

Cynical? Me? Naaaaaahhhh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Perhaps a disadvantage of all of the positive press we&#8217;ve seen over the past two years?&#8221;</p>
<p>MHO, more a disadvantage that the province gives the federal Conservatives 13 of 14 seats every election come hell or high water.</p>
<p>- When the Libs are in power, why bother? We (collectively) don&#8217;t give them any seats regardless of how much they offer us.</p>
<p>- When the Cons are in power, why bother? We (collectively) give them seats regardless of how little they offer us.</p>
<p>Face it, democracies are the same everywhere; it&#8217;s the swing ridings that get the pork from both sides, while electorates that are solidly in the pocket (or solidly out of reach) get ignored.</p>
<p>Cynical? Me? Naaaaaahhhh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

